Europa Universalis V on Steam - User reviews, Price & Information
Quick menu
Use war, trade or diplomacy to satisfy your grandest ambitions and dominate five centuries of history in the newest version of Europa Universalis, Paradox Interactive's flagship historical grand strategy game.
Europa Universalis V is a grand strategy, strategy and historical game
developed by Paradox Tinto
and published by Paradox Interactive.
Released on November 04th 2025 is available only on Windows
in 11 languages: English, French, German, Spanish - Spain, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese - Brazil, Russian, Simplified Chinese and Turkish.
It has received 29,156 reviews of which 19,875 were positive and 9,281 were negative resulting in a rating of 6.7 out of 10. 😐
The game is currently priced at 59.99€ on Steam, but you can find it for 44.51€ on Gamivo.
The Steam community has classified Europa Universalis V into these genres:
Media & Screenshots
Get an in-depth look at Europa Universalis V through various videos and screenshots.
Load More
System requirements
These are the minimum specifications needed to play the game. For the best experience, we recommend that you verify them.
Windows
- Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
- OS: Windows® 10 Home 64 Bit
- Processor: Intel® Core™ i7-8700K | AMD® Ryzen™ 5 3600
- Memory: 16 GB RAM
- Graphics: Nvidia® GeForce™ GTX 1060 (6GB) | AMD® Radeon™ RX 580 (8GB) | Intel® Arc™ A380 (6GB) | Intel® Arc™ 140V
- Storage: 20 GB available space
User reviews & Ratings
Explore reviews from Steam users sharing their experiences and what they love about the game.
Recommended only if you accept being part of the long Paradox development cycle. I want to be fair to Paradox: Europa Universalis V is not a lazy game. It is not empty. It is not without care. The work is visible. The ambition is visible. The historical appetite is visible. Population, economy, state-building, map scale, slower pacing, alternate history, logistics, diplomacy, internal politics — all of it points toward the kind of grand strategy game I want to exist. That is why this review is difficult. I do not dislike EU5 because it lacks vision. I love the vision. The more alive the simulation becomes, the more I want to believe in it. I want the world to feel material. I want population to matter. I want economy to have weight. I want the map to resist me. I want history to feel like pressure, not just decoration. I want alternate history to emerge from systems, not from shallow fantasy. I even miss custom nations, because in a game like this, authorship matters. I do not only want to consume history; I want to create my own impossible historical machine inside it. But effort is not the same as stewardship. EU5 currently feels like a game whose vision is larger than the structure carrying it. Either the team needs more capacity, or the management structure needs to be better, or the development rhythm needs to become more disciplined. From the player’s side, the result is tiring: I bought a game I increasingly cannot enjoy until a truly stable patch exists. That is the central wound. I am not blind enough, or indifferent enough, to ignore how and why things work or do not work. EU5 asks me to understand its systems deeply, but the more deeply I understand them, the more obvious the cracks become. Its incompleteness is not hidden by complexity; it is exposed by complexity. When EU5 works, it feels alive. When it does not, it feels like labor. Not the meaningful labor of building a state through centuries, but administrative fatigue: waiting for performance to stabilize, wondering whether a patch has changed the rules too much, restarting campaigns, reading around bugs, deciding whether the current version is finally safe enough to invest another dozens of hours into. That is not just inconvenience. In a game this long and dense, instability becomes a tax on attention. And people’s attention matters. A grand strategy campaign is not a disposable match. It is study, imagination, planning, patience, failed starts, system knowledge, emotional investment, and long-form trust. If a game asks for that much of the player, then stability is not a luxury. Performance is not a luxury. Campaign continuity is not a luxury. Clarity is not a luxury. These are the minimum conditions for asking the player to give the game their time. This is why EU5 is not just sold as a game; it is sold as a future, and that future must earn the player’s time before it asks for the player’s money. I am not against DLC. I am not against long development cycles. I understand the Paradox model. I know the bells. I hear the rhythm. These games often become themselves over years. But knowing the process does not make the process less tiring. It does not make the early instability harmless. It does not make the player’s time less valuable. The first DLC captures the contradiction perfectly. I want more flavor. I want Byzantium. I want regional mechanics, alternate paths, historical texture, new systems, new events, more living detail. In that sense, the DLC is acceptable. But paid expansion content feels very different when the base experience still needs stabilization. Then it becomes both acceptable and insulting at once: acceptable as content, insulting as timing. That is where the suspicion enters. Is this ambition, or is it also a taste for capital? I cannot prove motive. I can only judge the structure and the result. And the structure asks the player to buy into a future while the present still feels insufficiently whole. The result is that love turns into fatigue. The game’s own greatness makes its pitfall more painful, because I can see what it wants to be, and I can also feel how much of that promise still lands on my patience rather than on finished design. Paradox is trying hard. That is visible. But the player does not live inside effort. The player lives inside the result. And right now, the result often leaves me disappointed. I hope someone competent, someone who actually plays and understands this game, is leading its future. I want that to be true. I want EU5 to become magnificent. I want this simulation to mature into the game it is clearly trying to become. But I cannot review hope as if it were already reality. I can only review the experience I have been given. So my recommendation is conditional. I recommend EU5 to Paradox veterans who understand that buying this game means entering a long process of patches, DLC, balance shifts, redesigns, instability, recovery, and eventual maturation. I do not recommend it casually to new players. There is too much to digest, and the current state is too demanding to be a fair first road into the series. Thumbs up, but with a definitive warning. EU5 has the bones of something magnificent. But right now, I cannot play it as freely as I want to, because the game is not whole enough for its own ambition. I am waiting for a stable patch not because I stopped loving the idea, but because I respect my time too much to keep feeding it into an unfinished rhythm. Paradox is trying hard. That matters. But trying is not enough. Until the present is stable enough to carry its own ambition, the future should not be allowed to charge interest on the player’s patience. EU5 is not failing because it lacks ambition. It fails, when it fails, because ambition is outpacing governance. The simulation wants to be alive, but the structure carrying it still feels too unstable to deserve unconditional trust. I still love this game. That is exactly why I cannot give it a soft review. A game this good in concept deserves criticism sharp enough to protect what it could become. Thank you for your time. I am not sorry for the sharpness. EU5 deserves better than polite disappointment.
Expand the review
I absolutely love this game EU5 is ambitious, interconnected, and alive. It takes the best of EU4, MEIOU, Victoria 2, CK2, and CK3, layering those elements atop the Imperator: Rome framework to create the deepest and most flexible Paradox experience yet. Every choice, whether political, economic, cultural, or military, ripples through your nation’s fabric. It abandons abstract mana and static modifiers in favor of living systems: people, infrastructure, politics, and trade. It’s undoubtedly more complex, but rewards mastery. Your empire is alive and ever-growing (or shrinking if you're screwing up). As your population develops and internal political blocs spend their money to build industries, it needs regular care lest it grow misshapen. YOU ARE THE GARDENER. Water it when supply is lacking, prune it back into shape when in excess, and if any of those political blocs turn into parasites then rip them out, root and stem. Pros: [*]No launcher required, fast loading screens, integrated mod manager. Savescumming is easier than ever before. ;) [*]Automation: I can't deny that this is a MASSIVE boon for the player base. Pretty much any mechanic of the game is automatable, allowing the AI to manage almost any aspect of your country. For those who might struggle with certain mechanics early on or hate micromanagement, just give it to the AI while you focus on other things. Although competent, its not as good as a player, and it obviously can't know your long-term objectives or roleplaying desires, so you're still incentivized to learn the mechanics yourself if you want to maximize their utility. [*]Politics: Adds depth and complexity to the genre, every system is interconnected with it. Balancing the various political estates in your country has an impact on your economy, diplomacy, military, and population. You walk a tightrope, balancing the satisfaction and influence of your nation's internal stakeholders. Play them off each other well and their support can bolster your rule, incur their dissatisfaction or allow them too much power however; and they'll make you their ♥♥♥♥♥. [*]Values: In Vic 3 politics were nebulous. It felt like you were reacting rather than influencing, forced to implement whatever policies the movements in your country demanded. The system in EU5 is flexible enough to allow you mix and match values that would perhaps seem conflicting to a modern person, its possible to play as an innovative yet spiritualist empire with a capital economy running off of serfdom. Does it sound strange? Sure, but its your job to make it work with all the positives and negatives that each value gives you. [*]Economy: Each country is unique in the types and number of RGOs they have, the goods and market neighbors a country's market has, and what economic value system they start with. It incentivizes you to not just build up your industry, but to also trade with other nations (or conquer them). Starts are more unique even for obscure nations that lack flavor and events. Economic warfare is incredible, embargoes aren't just a modifier anymore, they'll actually stop the target country receiving goods and depriving them of vital resources to manage their nation. Market Attraction and Trade Advantage mean that you cripple your enemies without ever drawing your sword. Investing in your economic power and its foreign projection can be just as profitable as conquering, and it'll cost less pops to do so. [*]Population: Mana is gone and replaced with multiple interwoven systems. Managing your population and industries is an engaging past-time in between wars. I find myself much more willing to just sit back and manage my nation during peace time. Every single action you take, and every mechanic you interact with influences your population and demographics and vice-versa. That soldier you're marching into battle over a river crossing? He's the laborer who works in your lumbermill. If he dies, that's one less guy to cut your trees for you (and the cost of goods and construction will rise), if he doesn't come home then that's also one less person to have children. Diseases, starvation, and wars actually feel painful as a result and you have to dedicate soldiers and ships to maintaining your supply lines. [*]Control: Infrastructure is now VITAL. It really feels like building an empire, trying to exert control with roads and shipping lanes, the system is an incredible solution to the "bigger is better" playstyle eu4 nudged you towards, Now you actually have to be able to reap the benefits from conquered lands if you want to extract wealth and resources, incentivizing you to trade before conquering. You now need to wait till you can develop my naval infrastructure to begin expanding overseas. You may want to subsidize industries and overproduce the construction materials to lower the cost of building roads and ports across your empire. [*]Integration: Its no longer just a button click with a mana cost! You actually need to ensure they're at least a tolerated culture before. Even then, tolerated cultures can only be integrated, but not cored. You need them to be an accepted culture to do that. Either accept or convert them. [*]War: Frontage and Initiative, combined with the ability to choose where units are placed in your army's formation (L/C/R) adds a surprising amount of tactical depth. Understanding which units are slower/faster to the frontline but better/worse at holding it, which are better flankers, and where they should be all be positioned for optimal performance is engaging. And with ever-modernizing warfare, enemies develop unique armies with their own strengths and weaknesses that you've got to adapt your own armies formations for. Army composition is impacted by politics and population. Playing as France, I actually want to keep the nobles powerful a bit longer because I love having a lot of those Mailed Knights in my levies. Dilute their power and population? Less knights. [*]Parliament: Putting province-claim Casus Bellis behind the Parliament system really helps to slow down your expansion while adding a political element. What's more is that the system handles it with nuance. The internal political blocs in EU5 use incentives rather than coercion. You won't be forced to pass a law like in Vic3, instead if you want to temporarily raise taxes or levies, change a law, or get approval to claim that lucrative province your neighbor owns; Then you need to give the political blocs a concession. This means you actually have to weigh internal vs external politics. You agonize over passing a law that the nobles want but you know will dilute your centralization or crown power, in the mean time your ally is encroaching upon that province you want. If you choose to wait for the next parliament and hope for better demands, will the province still be free to grab? [*]Start Date: I like 1337. I get to enjoy the climax of the Medieval Period and play a feudal subsistence society, then change my values and focus as the renaissance then exploration eras come along or choose to try and stick with the old ways. In Eu4 it wasn't often that I needed to make big changes to the estate privileges once I got past the early game. However Eu5's mechanics give you the sense that the world significantly changes over time, and sometimes you have completely rethink your approach in order to stay competitive; the earlier start date adds a greater contrast between early and mid-late game playstyles. I don't think this start date would have worked well in EU4, but EU5's depth makes it valid. I originally had a much longer review with more detail and an entire Cons section, however Steam's character limit prevents me from fitting it here. EU5 is superb though, with the launch issues being AI/UI based, such as vague tooltips, lack of options in some Situations, passivity in war or lack of expansion. Updates will hopefully fix that quickly.
Expand the review
This game is so wildly ambitious that it shouldn’t function in our world, yet somehow it does. It's alien technology. An atlas in video game form, it simulates all 400 million people alive on Earth in 1337, from the 1,085 settlers in Greenland to the 92 million people of China, following them hour by hour over 500 years of history while remaining fun and performant. It’s the foundation of a genuine masterpiece, complete with the Black Death rendered as an early game boss. If you’ve enjoyed any Paradox Studios game in the past, play this one too. Don't skip the tutorials though.
Expand the review
I was fully prepared to dislike EU5, but I can't. This is a good game and sets the standard not just for future games, but retrospectively for past ones. Paradox has been dropping the ball for a long time with half-baked, bare-bones releases that barely function and have zero depth, expecting you to buy three years of DLC before the game gets good. EU5 doesn't seem to be that. This game comes across as a passion project from the Paradox of old. The Paradox of EU3, CK2, and Victoria 2. And it shows in how much this game borrows from those old games, while improving on it. If you're wondering where some of the negative reviews come from, a large portion of them are disappointed EU4 fans who wanted the game to be more like that. This game is clearly not a spiritual successor to EU4, but to EU3. This game is a departure from what Paradox has been doing for the last few years. Gone are the days of catering to 'meme' players. There are no magical focus trees. No mana. No absurd events with silly naked people. This is not a game made for viral memes and youtube videos. Mappainting is a relatively slow process and snowballing is somewhat restrained because you can only control the periphery of your empire so much. The game is unapologetic about its desire to be a serious grand strategy game with lots of interlocking systems. This isn't a patchwork of random features that don't interact. Every game aspect ties into every other aspect. Pops are tied to estates which are linked to taxation which funds your court costs which affects your legitimacy which changes your estate happiness which affects your pop satisfaction which is tied to your levy size and on and on it goes. Everything is interlinked and it's great. And most shocking of all, multiplayer works. We had a few desynchs, tolerable for a fresh release, but we were able to resynch and continue playing. It has its problems. The biggest, most glaring problem is the AI. The game is just too complex for the current AI to handle well. Or even handle competently. The AI really is a pushover right now, meaning you face no challenge at all. Paradox doesn't have a good reputation for making competent AI anyway, and this game looks like it will be particularly tough to make a good AI for. I'm still skeptical if this will ever be addressed. But given the work that went into this game's design, I'm actually willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. The UI has some issues and can definitely be improved, but it's nowhere near as bad as some of the negative reviews make it out to be. The game simply has a lot of information and it has to put it all somewhere. Do not go into this expecting to fully understand everything on your screen at a glance. No UI change will make that happen. All in all, this game is worth trying out if you're looking for a more serious grand strategy game.
Expand the review
I never write reviews, but I've been playing Paradox/grand strategy games for over a decade and wanted to say thank you. Haven't had any crashes, the systems are mind-boggingly confusing and in-depth, I rarely know what I'm doing and I'm having the time of my life. I'm in my 30s with a kid and this is the first time I've wanted to take a week off just to play a game in years.
Expand the review
Similar games
View all
Europa Universalis IV
Rule your land and dominate the world with unparalleled freedom, depth and historical accuracy. Write a new history of the world and build an empire for the ages.
NOBUNAGA'S AMBITION: Sphere of Influence
Become a Daimyo of the Warring States period of Japanese history in NOBUNAGA'S AMBITION, a historical simulation game of conquest and domination. It is the 30th anniversary of this series and this current release, NOBUNAGA'S AMBITION: Sphere of Influence, is the crown of the series.
Civil War II
You take the part of the military and political leadership, trying to lead your nation to victory, in the midst of some of the toughest operations of the Civil War. You will build, organize and command your armies over one of the largest maps of the USA ever made for a Civil War game.
March of the Eagles
“he Who Fears Being Conquered Is Sure Of Defeat.”The war-game March of the Eagles focuses on the dramatic conflicts of Europe during 1805 to 1820. Explore one of the defining periods in European history with this experience crafted by the masters of Grand Strategy, Paradox Development Studio.
Terra Invicta
An alien invasion has fractured humanity into seven ideological factions each with a unique vision for the future. Lead your chosen faction to take control of Earth’s nations, expand across the Solar System, and battle enemy fleets in tactical combat.
Power & Revolution 2020 Edition
The new version of Geopolitical Simulator 4, the ultrarealistic simulator of today's world where you play as the head of state or as the opposition! Stop the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic and restart the economy, participate in the US elections or engage in lightning wars with new 2020 scenarios.
Patrician III
Become a fellow of the famous medieval Hanse trading association in the 13th century. Manage the politics, prestige and economic success in your city and the known parts of Europe!
Victoria 3
Paradox Development Studio invites you to build your ideal society in the tumult of the exciting and transformative 19th century. Balance the competing interests in your society and earn your place in the sun in Victoria 3, one of the most anticipated games in Paradox’s history.
Making History II: The War of the World
What if Germany won the Battle of Britain? What if Moscow fell in 1942?You’re in charge. Anything can happen and history will never repeat itself in this classic WWII grand strategy game MAKING HISTORY II: The War of the World. Are you ready to battle for global dominance?
Victoria II
Carefully guide your nation from the era of absolute monarchies in the early 19th century, through expansion and colonization, to finally become a truly great power by the dawn of the 20th century. Victoria II is a grand strategy game played during the colonial era of the 19th century, where the player takes control of a country, guiding...
Imperator: Rome
Dominate the classical Mediterranean in Imperator: Rome, a grand strategy game from Paradox Interactive. Navigate the dangerous waters of politics and diplomacy as you build up your provinces and conquer foreign lands. Now available with special content and the digital artbook.
Frequently Asked Questions
Europa Universalis V is currently priced at 59.99€ on Steam.
No, Europa Universalis V is currently not on sale. You can purchase it for 59.99€ on Steam.
Yes, Europa Universalis V received 19,875 positive votes out of a total of 29,156 achieving a rating of 6.73.
😐
Europa Universalis V was developed by Paradox Tinto and published by Paradox Interactive.
Yes, Europa Universalis V is playable and fully supported on Windows.
No, Europa Universalis V is not playable on MacOS.
No, Europa Universalis V is not playable on Linux.
Europa Universalis V offers both single-player and multi-player modes.
Europa Universalis V offers both Co-op and PvP modes.
Yes, there are 3 DLCs available for Europa Universalis V. Explore additional content available for Europa Universalis V on Steam.
Yes, Europa Universalis V is fully integrated with Steam Workshop. Visit Steam Workshop.
No, Europa Universalis V does not support Steam Remote Play.
Yes, Europa Universalis V is enabled for Steam Family Sharing. This means you can share the game with authorized users from your Steam Library, allowing them to play it on their own accounts. For more details on how the feature works, you can read the original Steam Family Sharing announcement or visit the Steam Family Sharing user guide and FAQ page.
You can find solutions or submit a support ticket by visiting the Steam Support page for Europa Universalis V.
Data sources
The information presented on this page is sourced from reliable APIs to ensure accuracy and relevance. We utilize the Steam API to gather data on game details, including titles, descriptions, prices, and user reviews. This allows us to provide you with the most up-to-date information directly from the Steam platform.
Additionally, we incorporate data from the SteamSpy API, which offers insights into game sales and player statistics. This helps us present a comprehensive view of each game's popularity and performance within the gaming community.
Last Updates| Steam data | 04 June 2026 08:25 |
|---|---|
| SteamSpy data | 12 June 2026 06:57 |
| Steam price | 13 June 2026 13:02 |
| Steam reviews | 13 June 2026 08:07 |
If you'd like to dive deeper into the details about Europa Universalis V, we invite you to check out a few dedicated websites that offer extensive information and insights. These platforms provide valuable data, analysis, and user-generated reports to enhance your understanding of the game and its performance.
- SteamDB - A comprehensive database of everything on Steam about Europa Universalis V
- SteamCharts - Analysis of Europa Universalis V concurrent players on Steam
- ProtonDB - Crowdsourced reports on Linux and Steam Deck Europa Universalis V compatibility
59.99€
Visit Store
🔥 Deal
-26%
59.99€
44.51€
Buy Now
-26%
59.99€
44.89€
Visit Store
-24%
59.99€
45.93€
Visit Store
-22%
59.99€
47.09€
Visit Store
Game modes
Multiplayer
Features
Online players
6,580
Developer
Paradox Tinto
Publisher
Paradox Interactive
Release
04 Nov 2025
Platforms
Clicking and buying through these links helps us earn a commission to maintain our services.